Global warming: Are the models wrong?

It has become one of the most important questions of modern science – but are we looking in the right place for the answer to climate change?

Climate models help predict the impact of global warming – but are they correct? (Figure prepared by Robert A. Rohde from public domain data and is incorporated into the Global Warming Art project.)

No one knows exactly how much Earth’s climate will warm due to carbon emissions, but a new study this week suggests scientists’ best predictions about global warming might be incorrect.

The study, which appears in Nature Geoscience, found that climate models explain only about half of the heating in Earth’s ancient past. The study, which was published online today, contains an analysis of published records from a period of rapid climatic warming about 55 million years ago known as the Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum, or PETM.

 “In a nutshell, theoretical models cannot explain what we observe in the geological record,” said oceanographer Gerald Dickens, a co-author of the study and professor of Earth science at Rice University. “There appears to be something fundamentally wrong with the way temperature and carbon are linked in climate models.”

During the PETM, for reasons that are still unknown, the amount of carbon in Earth’s atmosphere rose rapidly. For this reason, the PETM – which has been identified in hundreds of sediment core samples worldwide – is probably the best ancient climate analogue for present-day Earth.

Based on findings related to oceanic acidity levels during the PETM and on calculations about the cycling of carbon among the oceans, air, plants and soil, Dickens and co-authors Richard Zeebe of the University of Hawaii and James Zachos of the University of California-Santa Cruz determined that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increased by about 70% during the PETM.
That’s significant because it does not represent a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide is an oft-talked-about threshold, and today’s climate models include accepted values for the climate’s sensitivity to doubling. Using these accepted values and the PETM carbon data, the researchers found that the models could only explain about half of the warming that Earth experienced 55 million years ago.

The conclusion, Dickens said, is that something other than carbon dioxide caused much of the heating during the PETM. “Some feedback loop or other processes that aren’t accounted for in these models – the same ones used by the IPCC for current best estimates of 21st Century warming – caused a substantial portion of the warming that occurred during the PETM.”

2 Responses to Global warming: Are the models wrong?

  1. Brian Dodge says:

    Mike, whoever gave you that analysis that CO2 could cool the atmosphere neglected to take into account that:
    1. The atmosphere cools as it rises(google “lapse rate”, so CO2 carried to higher altitudes doesn’t have excess energy to radiate away.
    2. Half the energy that the CO2 does radiate is radiated back down to the surface, where it adds to the energy from incoming sunlight, causing additional warming.

  2. Mike says:

    Carbon dioxide also has a cooling effect because whilst at low levels it absorbs IR, when the natural convective currents takes the CO2 high into the atmosphere, the flip side is that it emits more IR and hence cools the atmosphere. Whilst the media only talk about the warming effect, it is quite possible the cooling effect of CO2s dominates.
    It is well known that CO2 levels increased at the end of the last iceage but AS A RESULT of naturally warming temperatures and not in advance of such warming which would suggest they caused the warming.
    So it is quite possible far from causing global warming, CO2 may actually help to stabilise the climate.

Comment on this story is your website - so tell us what you think. Just complete the form below, and lets get the debate started!